Comments on: Ruby is strongly-typed, until you want to weaken it. http://grahamis.com/blog/2008/01/03/ruby-is-strongly-typed-until-you-want-to-weaken-it/ It's too real to be true Sat, 07 May 2011 05:40:39 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Josh Graham http://grahamis.com/blog/2008/01/03/ruby-is-strongly-typed-until-you-want-to-weaken-it/comment-page-1/#comment-453 Josh Graham Wed, 24 Mar 2010 20:30:16 +0000 http://grahamis.com/blog/2008/01/03/ruby-is-strongly-typed-until-you-want-to-weaken-it/#comment-453 LOL anonymous coward, let me know who you are so I can give you a clue bat. LOL anonymous coward, let me know who you are so I can give you a clue bat.

]]> By: qwerty http://grahamis.com/blog/2008/01/03/ruby-is-strongly-typed-until-you-want-to-weaken-it/comment-page-1/#comment-452 qwerty Wed, 24 Mar 2010 19:47:45 +0000 http://grahamis.com/blog/2008/01/03/ruby-is-strongly-typed-until-you-want-to-weaken-it/#comment-452 Um, no. You aren't weakening anything because guess what? You call to_s which returns a new String object. Your second example is even more ridiculous and you can do the same thing in any OO language. Crappy programming doesn't make a language "less" anything. Um, no.

You aren’t weakening anything because guess what? You call to_s which returns a new String object.

Your second example is even more ridiculous and you can do the same thing in any OO language.

Crappy programming doesn’t make a language “less” anything.

]]>